Scenario Overview:

A couple approached you with the desire to have a minimalistic wedding ceremony. They planned to have 50 guests and chose a busy intersection in a park on a city street corner as their venue. The couple wanted to keep the ceremony extremely simple, only exchanging vows and rings with no additional elements.

​

Initial Consultation and Legal Requirements

During your initial conversation, you explained the legal requirements for a marriage ceremony in Australia:

1. Section 46 of the Marriage Act 1961:

This section requires the celebrant to state the legal wording and use their full legal registered name during the ceremony.

2. Section 45 of the Marriage Act 1961:

This section requires that the couple’s vows be exchanged in the presence of their witnesses.

Despite your explanations, the couple expressed their desire to omit these legal statements to keep the ceremony simple. They repeatedly asked you to skip these elements.

​

Addressing Client Concerns:

You emphasized the importance of adhering to the legal requirements, stating that the marriage would not be valid without these components. You explained that:

The celebrant must say the legal wording of Section 46 during the ceremony.

The couple must exchange their vows in the presence of witnesses as per Section 45.

This insistence created some friction with the couple, who felt that including these elements would complicate their simple ceremony.

PA System Concerns

The couple was also unhappy about using a PA system, as they wanted to dash in and out during their lunch break and felt that a PA would make the event more grandiose than they intended. However, you had concerns about the noise levels from the busy intersection and ensuring that the ceremony was audible to the 50 guests.

 

Communication and Resolution:

To address these concerns, you used clear communication to explain your reasoning:

Legal Compliance: You reiterated that the legal wording must be stated to legally solemnize the marriage. Without it, the ceremony would not be legally valid.

Audibility: You explained the importance of ensuring that the ceremony was audible to all guests despite the noise from the busy street corner. A PA system would ensure that everyone, including the witnesses, could hear the legal wording and vows clearly.

By addressing their concerns and explaining the necessity of these elements, you were able to reassure the couple. They began to understand the importance of complying with legal requirements and ensuring that the ceremony was audible to all attendees.

​

Outcome:

The couple eventually felt at ease with your explanations and agreed to include the necessary legal statements and use a PA system. You all moved forward harmoniously, with the couple appreciating your professionalism and understanding.

​

Conclusion:

This case highlights the importance of clear communication and professionalism when dealing with clients who may not fully understand legal requirements. By patiently explaining the necessity of the legal elements and addressing their concerns about the ceremony's simplicity and audibility, you ensured that the wedding was both legally compliant and aligned with the couple's wishes. This approach facilitated a harmonious resolution, ensuring a successful and legally valid ceremony.

Relevant Sections of the marriage act 1961:

Marriage of a Minor:

Marriage Act 1961, Section 12

Evidence of Place and Date of Birth:

Marriage Act 1961, Section 42(1)(b)

Marriage Regulations 2017, Regulation 38

Evidence of How Last Marriage Ended:

Marriage Act 1961, Section 42(10)

Marriage Regulations 2017, Regulation 39

Use of an Interpreter:

Marriage Act 1961, Section 112

Marriage Regulations 2017, Regulation 40

Ensuring the Ceremony is Audible and Clear:

Marriage Act 1961, Section 46(2)

Using the Legal Wording (Sections 45 and 46):

Marriage Act 1961, Section 45

Marriage Act 1961, Section 46